Occasionally there is some enlightened client with which you can apply advanced methodologies (okay, just say methods) to design the intranet.
In this case we had carte blanche on virtually everything, and perhaps a sign of the times we did focus groups, brainstorming and also incredible, well-sixth session of card sorting with employees.
On one side there was me, Christian and someone of the Directorate, and the other from time to time, groups of 3 or 4 employees. In between, a mixed content, described by white cards, which can be brought together and put a name with the yellow cards.
Here's the situation:

Here are some of the results




Needless to say, the results were very interesting and gave us several indications on the design of the intranet pages and labels.
Here are some pointers for those wishing to achieve synthesis of card sorting internally.
1) Two types of groups. Create two groups: those professionally homogeneous and those belonging to different sectors. In the first instance be able to get a fairly accurate mental map of the different groups profesisonali, while the latter can more easily detect the points of friction and ambiguous content.
2) aloud. It 'important to the outcome, but also what is happening during the card sorting. Make express aloud their thought processes in order to reap the mental steps that lead them to make choices deterimnate.
3) Colaboration among participants. It 'important that people, during the card sorting, diascutano together and seek an agreement. Avoid that everyone does his homework individually. The choices of the group are on average more intelligent and interesting.
4) Focus on himself. Sometimes there is a tendency by participants to identify oneself in the shoes of the "connection type". Try to make them work in relation to their specific needs and their particular ideas, ensuring that you put "other side" improvising designers.
5) short duration. Not more than 40-50 minutes
6) Names of the groups. And 'important that people not only bringing together content, but also give them a name. To name a set forcing participants to check the tightness of their choices and to notice inconsistencies or overlaps. Often during the creation of names are also moving consiestenti grouped among the papers.
Well, now you have no more excuses ...