A very interesting recent articles Steptwo this time dedicated to the theme of moderation of discussion spaces on the intranet . The theme is close to my heart, as you know, and I have written many times about it.
The article has the merit to highlight some critical issues and to propose alternatives in the thematic approach of moderation.
In summary, here are the points that Alex Manchester in the spotlight:
- Policy: Every company has its characteristics and its internal dynamics, for which there is no universal approach, but guidelines are still always prepared, and the article link different sources (perhaps the most interesting is the policy of BT, downloadable pdf )
- Identity, each contribution should esserfe associated with a clearly defined, avoiding anonymous discussions. The name should always appear vicnio contribution to (and I would add, make your profile )
- Single sign-on: to reduce stress and improve the user experience user, the authentication mechanism should rely on more general single sign-on inside, so not having to continually re-type your password and UID
- Moderate: The article proposes between choices:
- self-restraint
- moderation 'light'
- moderation "full"
Identifying risks and opportunities for each. I personally believe that there is no clear boundary between these three choices: I believe that things will change much with the passage of time (usually more than passing control to less control) as well as I think sometimes the full moderation on some aspects (eg technical issues) living with self-restraint in other respects.
In any case, the list of factors critical to the success of a proposed debate I would like to add some features not listed in the article:
- Report abuse: add this item to any contribution you can loosen the reins, leaving the community the task of a first filter, as well as give a clear signal about the fact that not everything is permitted
- Rate this contribution: it allows to clearly identify the content deemed best, feeding a virtuous circle
- Facilities: The whole system must be easy to use. Simply. If it becomes just another application cumbersome to use or portray people do not even consider the height to be involved (Hood)
- Keywords: keep a nice list of keywords "hot" and let them get a warning whenever they are written. This reduces the need for precise control but still be placed in the situation
- Black List and Gold List: people will end up in "black list" or "Gold List" depending on their behavior, condition differences in access privileges.
Anything else?
















